Enterprise Web Development

Requirements are collected from each group separately, then brought into one register where every item has an owner, a priority and a reason. Conflicts get resolved at a named decision point rather than in the build. A single product owner on your side signs off each phase. That stops the website becoming a negotiation between departments every time a template is reviewed.

WCAG 2.2 level AA unless your organisation requires something different. That covers colour contrast, keyboard access, focus states, form labels, alt text, captions and more. Testing combines automated tools, manual keyboard checks and screen readers, and you receive an issue log. Accessibility also depends on content, so editors get guidance on headings, link text and documents. Overlay widgets are not a substitute for accessible code.

Usually, if the system has a documented API or supported connector. Data ownership, field mapping, authentication method and error handling are confirmed before building, and each integration is tested in staging with realistic data. If a vendor's API is limited, we'll say so early and suggest alternatives such as a scheduled sync or middleware, rather than discovering the limit after launch.

In phases. Discovery is priced first and produces a requirements register and an estimate for the build. Build and integration phases are then priced against that register, with change requests handled in writing. Costs vary with the number of templates, integrations, brands and compliance reviews. The budget guide gives context on how web investment relates to the marketing that depends on it.

As a first look, yes. The audit reviews a sample of your key templates for speed, indexing, structure, accessibility red flags and the enquiry path, and returns a prioritised checklist. It won't replace a full discovery phase or a formal accessibility audit, but it shows where the biggest gaps are and helps frame a business case. Request the free audit for your site.